🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
逃跑外勞又回到工廠,是否可繼續聘用? — sentence-by-sentence verification
5
Self-claimed, unverified
0
Third-party corroborated
0
Verifiable in government registry
0
Conflicts with public registry
What this page measures: Each sentence is tagged by how it can be checked: verifiable verbatim in government open data / corroborated by a third party / self-claimed and unverified (the organisation's own words — we do not endorse them) / conflicting with the public registry. This line has no clinical literature to check against, so no literature-support claim is made. The analysed text comes fromsource page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (5 statements)
HRA-22034145-0215
逃跑外勞又回到工廠,是否可繼續聘用?
🗣️ Self-claimed, unverified
官網自述,未對照政府登記或第三方來源,故不升級
HRA-22034145-0216
2015-11-02 Last updated : 2015-11-02 王 益東 外勞連續曠職三日內,雇主應通知各相關機關,並由勞動部撤銷聘僱許可,若外勞又返回工廠且雇主願意繼續雇用時 ,應於逃跑日一個月內辦理。
🗣️ Self-claimed, unverified
官網自述,未對照政府登記或第三方來源,故不升級
HRA-22034145-0217
但為免其他外勞仿效,雇主可考慮給予適當處罰;若逃跑外勞與非法集團有接觸,應考慮予以遣返,以免引誘其他外勞逃逸。
🗣️ Self-claimed, unverified
官網自述,未對照政府登記或第三方來源,故不升級
HRA-22034145-0218
Previous article 製造業工廠引進的外勞可否駕駛貨車,從事貨運行為?
🗣️ Self-claimed, unverified
官網自述,未對照政府登記或第三方來源,故不升級
HRA-22034145-0219
2015-11-02 Next article 雇主如何防止舊外勞煽動新外勞做出違反工廠規定之舉動?
🗣️ Self-claimed, unverified
官網自述,未對照政府登記或第三方來源,故不升級
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this entity's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform