🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
勞動部表示，修正 兩大重點 包括： （一 — sentence-by-sentence verification
2
Self-claimed, unverified
0
Third-party corroborated
0
Verifiable in government registry
0
Conflicts with public registry
What this page measures: Each sentence is tagged by how it can be checked: verifiable verbatim in government open data / corroborated by a third party / self-claimed and unverified (the organisation's own words — we do not endorse them) / conflicting with the public registry. This line has no clinical literature to check against, so no literature-support claim is made. The analysed text comes fromsource page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (2 statements)
HRA-16206990-0120
勞動部表示，修正 兩大重點 包括： （一）增列三大類被看護者多元認定方式，申請家庭看護移工免經醫療機構專業評估；擴大重新招募免評對象，放寬曾聘僱家庭看護移工且為75歲以上長者或持有無註記有效期間身心障礙證明者等二類對象免評。
🗣️ Self-claimed, unverified
官網自述，未對照政府登記或第三方來源，故不升級
HRA-16206990-0121
（二）擴大留用中階人力，放寬同雇主同移工累計工作6年以上可轉任中階技術人力、新增開放中階技術一般營造工作，並擴大開放中階技術農業工作增加林業、畜牧及養殖漁業等工作。
🗣️ Self-claimed, unverified
官網自述，未對照政府登記或第三方來源，故不升級
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this entity's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform