🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
張先生 患者實例故事－根尖手術36根尖 張先生左… — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
3
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (3 statements)
DNT-FD3948D0C8B5
張先生 患者實例故事－根尖手術36根尖 張先生左下第一大臼齒已在別間診所做過根管治療且也打釘柱做了假牙，之後膿包的情形為期1個月左右，於是來本院尋求治療。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-0B26E667F3D8
術前PANO照 術前X光片 可看出近心牙根黑影明顯， 且有接近到隔壁小臼齒的現象 經由黃醫師評估過後，如要以傳統方法重新治療，會需要花費很長的時間，拆除牙冠及釘柱治療完還要重新製作假牙，代價會很高。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 術前X光所見、近心牙根黑影、接近隔壁小臼齒、傳統再治療耗時拆冠釘柱及高代價等主張，evidence 完全無關
DNT-FFE62E092C1B
因此黃醫師建議直接做根尖切除術，一來可以保留假牙冠也可以保留大部分的齒質，二來可以直接將根尖有感染的地方切除掉，使用超音波器械和三鈣礦聚化合物(MTA)充填，療程時間短，代價相對比較小。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 整句 claim 均未被支持：根尖切除術、保留假牙冠與齒質、根尖感染切除、超音波器械與MTA充填、療程時間短及代價相對小等皆未出現在 evidence 中。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform