🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
賴先生 患者實例故事－根尖手術35根尖 賴先生因… — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
4
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (4 statements)
DNT-1BE1114A92A0
賴先生 患者實例故事－根尖手術35根尖 賴先生因為左下第二小臼齒在別家診所根管治療後，牙齒還是持續不舒服，因此被介紹而來本診所求診。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-7AA8EBB7FF1E
術前PANO照 黃醫師從X光看到這顆牙齒以前做的根管治療不算太差，也做了牙套保護起來，但根尖的黑影表示根管內部還有細菌殘留，，因此提供兩種方式讓賴先生做參考。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 術前PANO、黃醫師判讀、先前根管品質與牙套、根尖黑影代表細菌殘留、提供兩種選項
DNT-E3CA7AEE1181
第一種是傳統根管治療，但必須先把舊的假牙拆除，才能徹底將根管內部的感染源清潔乾淨，但這顆牙齒已經做過一次的治療，再重做一次對齒質就有比較大的損害。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 傳統根管治療需先拆除舊假牙、徹底清潔感染源、重做對齒質損害較大等全句主張均未被支持
DNT-972CB40962CE
第二種是根尖手術，直接將根尖發炎的部分切除掉，也可以保留原有的牙套， 只是牙齒會比較沒力一點。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 根尖手術切除發炎部位、保留原有牙套、術後牙齒較無力等均未提及
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform