🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS

Sentence-by-sentence verification

日光翡麗牙醫診所　·　Source page www.drma.tw/?p=2508 ↗　·　c　·　3 statements verified　·　← Back to analysis index

Provable

Partly supported

Pending

Contradicted

What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.

🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (3 statements)

DNT-39AC022018F7

通常植牙置入植體或根管治療後，下一步就是裝上牙冠套，目前牙冠套市場新寵兒就是「陶瓷假牙」。

○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)

10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 植牙置入植體或根管治療後是否下一步裝牙冠套，以及「陶瓷假牙」成為牙冠套市場新寵兒，均未在摘要中提及。

DNT-564EB1763358

「全瓷冠」透光自然適用前牙區「全皓冠」耐咬耐磨適用後牙區「全瓷冠」陶瓷假牙強度約在300-450MPa之間，硬度相當於自然牙的琺瑯質，外觀顏色自然、透光率高，全瓷冠在陽光下呈現的高透光感與真牙相當；「全皓冠」陶瓷假牙強度約在700-1200 Mpa之間，硬度比琺瑯質還堅硬，但全瓷冠缺點就是透光度較差，顏色略微死白。

○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)

10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。

DNT-8F11C854E1B5

」新竹植牙日光翡麗院長馬瑞宏表示，這兩種材質外觀及硬度各有其優勢，「全瓷冠」因其仿真牙的優勢，多用在前牙區域；「全皓冠」則用於需要咀嚼食物、咬合力承受較大的後牙區。

○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)

10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 「全瓷冠多用前牙、全皓冠用於後牙咬合區」之材質區分主張，以及院長馬瑞宏之發言均未被 evidence 支持。