🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS

新竹牙醫推薦日光翡麗牙醫診所 — sentence-by-sentence verification

日光翡麗牙醫診所 · Source page www.drma.tw/category/最新消息/page/37 ↗ · c · 5 statements verified · ← Back to analysis index

0
Provable
0
Partly supported
5
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.

🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (5 statements)

DNT-D5AA5D78D48F
新竹牙醫推薦日光翡麗牙醫診所,提供多項牙科專業醫療服務,若您有人工植牙、水雷射植牙、ODI一日速定植牙、牙周治療、牙齒美白貼片、自費補牙等需求,歡迎您來電0800-729-090預約門診諮詢。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過;不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-91CC7B11A825
」 「牙崩了以後,處理完又約診做根管治療,又再約診做假牙,每次要等上幾週甚至1個月,是不是有更快的方法完成修補?
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: claim 中「牙崩了以後,處理完又約診做根管治療,又再約診做假牙,每次要等上幾週甚至1個月」的等待時間及「更快的方法」完全未被 evidence 提及。
DNT-7EE8FB811277
儘管牙科醫療技術日益提升,植牙手術發展得相當健全,植牙成功率已高達90%,但仍然有部分患者因長達半年以上的漫長療程,退而求其次選擇重建較為快速、價格較便宜的固定式牙橋,這在牙醫師的眼中相當可惜。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 植牙成功率90%、半年以上療程、患者選擇牙橋、醫師覺得可惜等全部主張
DNT-D2B133D14AA2
... 新竹一日假牙|擬真全瓷冠 假牙也能美美的 11 月 15, 2019 日光翡麗 » 知識文章 » 新竹一日假牙|擬真全瓷冠 假牙也能美美的 「牙齒不漂亮會影響社交與自信」這項研究已獲得證實!
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過;不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-BEC8F966A8BE
新竹一日假牙門診-日光翡麗馬瑞宏院長分享一般人最在意的前牙區域,如果用太過死白的瓷塊製作牙冠或貼片,反而有欲蓋彌彰的感覺,本來要遮醜卻變得更顯眼;或者是貼片的厚度計算不當,本來想要讓齒列均勻整齊,卻因為做得太厚而產生暴牙效果,適得其反。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: claim 關於前牙瓷塊顏色過白或貼片厚度不當導致美觀問題,evidence 完全未提及。

🗂 Related analyses (8)

c · www.drma.tw/category/最新消息/page/36Sentence analysis (3) →
c · www.drma.tw/category/最新消息/page/39Sentence analysis (3) →
c · www.drma.tw/category/最新消息/page/34Sentence analysis (2) →
c · www.drma.tw/category/最新消息/page/40Sentence analysis (1) →
c · www.drma.tw/category/最新消息/page/33Sentence analysis (6) →
c · www.drma.tw/category/最新消息/page/41Sentence analysis (2) →
c · www.drma.tw/category/最新消息/page/32Sentence analysis (9) →
c · www.drma.tw/category/最新消息/page/42Sentence analysis (3) →
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
← Previous analysisNext analysis →Site-wide score charts

server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform