🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
一位長期往返美國與台灣的竹科高級主管 — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
3
Pending
1
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (4 statements)
DNT-1FA0F657D8F1
一位長期往返美國與台灣的竹科高級主管，透過親友介紹來到光明牙醫就診時，從對治療方案的懷疑、猶豫、質疑，溫智博醫師花了半年之久，取得了他的全盤信任，甚至介紹家人小孩，來到光明就診，醫病間的信任，是光明牙醫的核心精神之一。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 一位長期往返美國與台灣的竹科高級主管……醫病間的信任，是光明牙醫的核心精神之一。
DNT-7AFEE4361876
「這位病患之前在美國時牙痛就醫，需進行根管治療，由於美國的醫療制度和台灣不太相同，病患被轉診多次卻得不到理想的治療效果，對牙科治療已失去信任。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 未提及美國醫療制度、轉診經歷或患者信任問題
DNT-823249FBCA87
」 溫智博醫師說，由於資訊的發達，許多病人在就診前都會先上網查詢，這位病人也一樣，他認為植牙是種侵入性的手術，對於植牙會不會造成顏面神經的破壞、手術的風險與術後的成效等，他不斷地反覆和病人溝通，「我曾經動過手術，我了解病人的心態，因此當病人反覆確認治療的過程時，一定是不厭其煩地告知，直到他清楚明白。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-F6DE8CEB9ACA
溫智博醫師說，病人經過兩年的牙科治療，對於成果十分滿意，不但定期回診檢查，也把老婆和小孩介紹到光明牙醫，病人太太的一句「我先生非常信任你」，把全家的牙齒健康，都交給光明牙醫把關，病人對醫師的信任，就是對光明牙醫的肯定。
✕ Counter-evidence / contradiction
10 candidate paper(s) examined; counter-evidence found (this statement is not supported); still needed: 整个claim：温智博医师陈述的病人满意、介绍家人等
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform