🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
這也是為什麼竹北光明植牙中心決定斥資引進舒眠牙科… — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
3
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (3 statements)
DNT-85FDFE107770
這也是為什麼竹北光明植牙中心決定斥資引進舒眠牙科設備，用更具體、實際的方式來提升患者對看牙的接受度與信心。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 「竹北光明植牙中心決定斥資引進舒眠牙科設備」及「提升患者對看牙的接受度與信心」均為該中心之機構宣稱；evidence 僅討論 dental implant 知識與調查，未提及該診所、設備投資或舒眠牙科。
DNT-DBF05123668D
黃院長強調舒眠牙科具備高度安全性，因為劑量低、且有專業麻醉醫師陪同，在術後約5-10分鐘就能完全甦醒，在臨床經驗中鮮少有頭暈嘔吐的不適症產生，連兒童牙醫也適用。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 舒眠牙科安全性、劑量低、麻醉醫師陪同、術後5-10分鐘甦醒、少見頭暈嘔吐、兒童適用等全部宣稱
DNT-81D4C7B37D8B
上一頁 上一篇 竹北植牙│降低植牙風險最佳選擇-光明捍衛醫療品質 下一篇 慢性病也能植牙?
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 網頁導覽文字及「竹北植牙／降低植牙風險最佳選擇／光明捍衛醫療品質／慢性病也能植牙」等宣稱，無法由摘要支持。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform