🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
Sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
6
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (6 statements)
DNT-67C61E10031F
金屬假牙因黃金佔比不同而價格有高低之分，目前民眾會使用 金屬牙冠 多是預算的考量，所以選擇相對平價的半貴 金屬牙冠 及銀鈀合金牙冠。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 金屬假牙因黃金佔比不同而有價格高低、民眾因預算選用半貴金屬或銀鈀合金牙冠等市場/費用主張；證據僅討論樹脂假牙磨耗。
DNT-3428A5C0CC08
金屬游離的快慢取決於牙冠材質，若是賤金屬作成的牙冠，如:鎳金屬，較快發生游離，貴金屬或半貴金屬較穩定，發生游離的時間比較慢。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 牙冠材質決定金屬游離快慢、賤金屬/鎳較快、貴金屬/半貴金屬較慢的宣稱
DNT-C206CE6FA7BD
2.金屬牙冠引發過敏的風險 曾有看過這樣的新聞，患者裝上 金屬牙冠 一段期間之後，假牙的牙齦處出現廣泛性的發炎，治療後， 發炎雖有改善但久久無法痊癒，經過敏原測試之後，發現患者是對金、鉻、鎳等金屬有過敏反應。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 金屬牙冠過敏、金/鉻/鎳過敏原測試、廣泛性牙齦發炎與久未痊癒的新聞案例均未在 evidence 中
DNT-FC1ED00F3FCF
直到把 金屬牙冠 拆除，這樣的情況才有所消除改善。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 拆除金屬牙冠後症狀消除或改善
DNT-D9A004CDD86F
金屬牙冠 的特色就是硬度高、堅固耐用，不易因咬硬物崩裂損壞。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 整句宣稱：金屬牙冠硬度高、堅固耐用、不易因咬硬物崩裂損壞；證據為陶瓷牙冠根管開髓腔模擬
DNT-6773B69D5076
主要是與個人口腔是否會產生排斥狀況有關，金屬假牙短時間內戴著，人體或許不會產生過敏排斥，長時間下來，還是會有過敏排斥等風險存在，裝 金屬牙冠 之前這是要列入考量評估的重點，畢竟假牙是裝在人的口腔裡面。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 金屬假牙/金屬牙冠之過敏排斥、個人口腔排斥狀況、短/長期過敏風險及裝戴前評估等主張；證據僅討論樹脂假牙在活動義齒中的咬合磨耗。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform