🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS

金屬假牙因黃金佔比不同而價格有高低之分 — sentence-by-sentence verification

典雅牙醫診所 · Source page dentart.tw/metal-denture-is-good-or-not ↗ · c · 6 statements verified · ← Back to analysis index

0
Provable
0
Partly supported
6
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.

🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (6 statements)

DNT-780F3556570B
金屬假牙因黃金佔比不同而價格有高低之分,目前民眾會使用 金屬牙冠 多是預算的考量,所以選擇相對平價的半貴 金屬牙冠 及銀鈀合金牙冠。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 金属假牙黄金占比与价格关系、患者预算考量
DNT-514889918D91
金屬游離的快慢取決於牙冠材質,若是賤金屬作成的牙冠,如:鎳金屬,較快發生游離,貴金屬或半貴金屬較穩定,發生游離的時間比較慢。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 金屬游離速度與牙冠材質(賤金屬、貴金屬)的關係
DNT-41ABF184E56D
2.金屬牙冠引發過敏的風險 曾有看過這樣的新聞,患者裝上 金屬牙冠 一段期間之後,假牙的牙齦處出現廣泛性的發炎,治療後, 發炎雖有改善但久久無法痊癒,經過敏原測試之後,發現患者是對金、鉻、鎳等金屬有過敏反應。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 金屬牙冠引發過敏反應及相關牙齦發炎案例
DNT-947BDC332723
直到把 金屬牙冠 拆除,這樣的情況才有所消除改善。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 直到把 金屬牙冠 拆除,這樣的情況才有所消除改善。
DNT-CF8A7708EBDE
金屬牙冠 的特色就是硬度高、堅固耐用,不易因咬硬物崩裂損壞。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 金屬牙冠硬度高、耐用、不易崩裂
DNT-FDD92F8CAF99
主要是與個人口腔是否會產生排斥狀況有關,金屬假牙短時間內戴著,人體或許不會產生過敏排斥,長時間下來,還是會有過敏排斥等風險存在,裝 金屬牙冠 之前這是要列入考量評估的重點,畢竟假牙是裝在人的口腔裡面。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 主要是與個人口腔是否會產生排斥狀況有關,金屬假牙短時間內戴著,人體或許不會產生過敏排斥,長時間下來,還是會有過敏排斥等風險存在,裝金屬牙冠之前這是要列入考量評估的重點,畢竟假牙是裝在人的口腔裡面。

🗂 Related analyses (8)

c · dentart.tw/full-zirconia-crown-informationSentence analysis (6) →
c · dentart.tw/how-to-choose-your-dentureSentence analysis (12) →
c · dentart.tw/all-ceramic-crown-qa1Sentence analysis (13) →
c · dentart.tw/metal-denturesSentence analysis (4) →
c · dentart.tw/dental-implant-processSentence analysis (13) →
c · dentart.tw/closedannouncement20220414Sentence analysis (1) →
c · dentart.tw/2022-ching-ming-festivalSentence analysis (1) →
c · dentart.tw/all-ceramic-crown-lifeSentence analysis (8) →
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
← Previous analysisNext analysis →Site-wide score charts

server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform