🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
診斷 患者才36歲，但是全口幾乎都是殘根及嚴重牙… — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
3
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (3 statements)
DNT-5F4BC19ECE14
診斷 患者才36歲，但是全口幾乎都是殘根及嚴重牙周病，經評估後只能留下2個牙根，而且許多地方骨質破壞太嚴重，導致無法植牙。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-161E035E6C94
治療前 只剩5顆牙齒有牙冠，其餘都是殘根。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 整个claim：治疗前只剩5颗牙冠其余残根
DNT-4E033BBF9CF5
進行根管治療 3. 以臨時性活動假牙，
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: claim中‘进行根管治疗后使用临时活动假牙’的步骤未被evidence支持
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform