🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
Sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
2
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (2 statements)
DNT-18DE90702976
銀粉填補不但影響美觀，又有金屬溶出的疑慮，因此如果原來的齒質足夠，有些牙醫師也會建議採用假牙牙套。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-AE85BA58C841
後牙區牙齒小缺角 根管治療後 活髓保存術療程後 牙齒間的鄰接面 蛀牙補輟 3D齒雕(陶瓷嵌體)成本高、取模難，交給專業漾美學 上述的3D齒雕(陶瓷嵌體)缺點，多半是技術層面，這也是有些醫師選擇不做3D齒雕的原因，只做全瓷冠的原因，相較於3D齒雕(陶瓷嵌體)，全瓷冠方便許多，但這代表著患者會失去更多齒質，這也是漾美學牙醫診所不願見到的事情。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 後牙區小缺角、根管治療、活髓保存、鄰接面蛀牙、3D齒雕成本/取模難、全瓷冠會失去較多齒質、以及漾美學診所的立場，均未出現在 evidence 中。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform