🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
Sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
1
Partly supported
3
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (4 statements)
DNT-59794ACF3972
兒童蛀牙之預防 | 優格牙醫診所 UGOOD DENTAL CARE 兒童蛀牙之預防 – 優格牙醫診所 UGOOD DENTAL CARE 直接觀看文章 優格牙醫診所 UGOOD DENTAL CARE 診所官網!!!
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 『優格牙醫診所 UGOOD DENTAL CARE 診所官網』這個機構宣稱及網頁身分，evidence 完全未提及；只有一般兒童蛀牙預防的題材相近不足以支持。
DNT-400B21863918
選單 肌功能矯正 牙籤式刷牙法 透明矯正 人工植牙 睡眠呼吸中止症 未分類 兒童蛀牙之預防 發表於 2019-04-03 2019-05-09 由 ugoodsmile 撰寫 簡單說，兩方面，一是減少甜食之攝取，二是含氟牙膏的使用。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-169CF819A2B3
剛剛一直強調牙膏的重要，不過牙齒表面都是牙菌斑，牙膏無法直接接觸到牙齒表面，氟化物當然也無法對牙齒進行修復。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: evidence 直接斷言含氟牙膏中的氟化物可促進早期牙釉質侵蝕的修復，與 claim 宣稱『氟化物無法修復』相反。
DNT-71A3A6A49B32
目前政府提供6歲以下的兒童每半年免費塗氟，這個要好好利用，不過研究指出，每日低濃度(1000ppm)比起半年一次高濃度(9000ppm)還要有效，所以每天的刷牙是很重要的，就是塗氟後兩三天刷牙不用牙膏，不吃氟錠。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 政府對6歲以下兒童每半年免費塗氟、每日1000ppm 對比半年一次9000ppm 的優劣、塗氟後兩三天不用牙膏與不吃氟錠等具體宣稱，evidence 均未提及。
🗂 Related analyses (1)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform