🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS

Sentence-by-sentence verification

康橋牙醫診所 · Source page www.topimplant.com.tw/?p=2005 · c · 6 statements verified · ← Back to analysis index

0
Provable
2
Partly supported
4
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page.

🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (6 statements)

DNT-47FFC42A4B9B
康橋 板橋牙醫 表示, 植牙 再好再貴,永遠都比不上真牙,天然真牙咀嚼時牙齒周圍有牙周韌帶,扮演緩衝避震的角色,能緩和真牙牙根承受的咬合力道。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Osseoperception following dental implant treatment: A systematic review.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2022 · PMID 34911146
Supported scope: evidence 直接斷言植體的觸覺功能低於自然牙,主動與被動閾值分別高出約 5 倍與 50 倍。
DNT-1533945B74F0
然而,植牙的人工牙根直接與骨頭緊密結合,缺少牙周韌帶富彈性的緩衝中介,假牙與食物、齒槽骨「硬碰硬」,每次咀嚼時承受的咬合力到較大,日積月累下來,假牙破損、假牙斷裂的機率也較高。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 植牙缺乏牙周韌帶緩衝、咬合力較大、假牙破損或斷裂機率較高的機轉與風險
DNT-A466D25458B1
延伸閱讀: 【植牙壽命Q&A】植牙可以用多久?
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 植牙可用多久之具體壽命或長期存活率宣稱
DNT-290C0580300B
植牙、磨牙、愛吃硬食物 都跟假牙破損假牙斷裂大有關係 此外,在全鋯冠尚未問世前,過往使用的假牙材質大多為金屬附燒瓷牙,內層金屬支架外結燒上牙齒顏色的陶瓷,燒結陶瓷本身強度僅與琺瑯質相當,但在植牙缺乏緩衝機制的狀態下, 平時咬合力道較大、有磨牙或緊咬牙根習慣或是愛吃堅硬食物的患者,長期使用下,外層燒陶瓷咬崩咬裂,假牙破損、假牙斷裂的狀況,確實有可能發生 。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 植牙、磨牙、愛吃硬食物與假牙斷裂的關聯,及金屬燒附瓷牙外層陶瓷咬崩咬裂的風險
DNT-C3362BCEE643
全鋯冠假牙由二氧化鋯材質一體成形精密切削,假牙強度遠高於真牙琺瑯質,耐磨耐咬、堅固耐用,外觀貼近牙齒顏色,也可染色創造晶瑩透亮的效果, 不僅大幅降低假牙破損、假牙斷裂的狀況,單純用於製作牙冠套,也可減少修磨牙齒的量,保留珍貴齒質,有百利而無一害 。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
[Clinical evaluation on aesthetic effect of custom pressable metal ceramic abutment for dental implant restoration in anterior zone].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2013 · PMID 23991588
Supported scope: 證據僅支持以全瓷冠贋復可獲得理想美觀效果(前牙植牙案例),但未限定為全鋯冠。
DNT-0389A9B0074D
慎選優良牙醫診所最重要 康橋 板橋牙醫 表示,對於有長期磨牙或緊咬牙冠習慣的民眾,就醫時務必告知醫師,可事先給予咬合板不只保護假牙,也能保護真牙。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 特定診所宣稱、長期磨牙或緊咬牙關者需告知醫師、咬合板保護假牙與真牙等內容均未獲支持。

🗂 Related analyses (8)

c · www.topimplant.com.tw/?p=1980Sentence analysis (2) →
c · www.topimplant.com.tw/?p=1974Sentence analysis (9) →
c · www.topimplant.com.tw/?p=1989Sentence analysis (3) →
c · www.topimplant.com.tw/?p=1967Sentence analysis (13) →
c · www.topimplant.com.tw/?p=2024Sentence analysis (2) →
c · www.topimplant.com.tw/?p=1960Sentence analysis (20) →
c · www.topimplant.com.tw/?p=2070Sentence analysis (5) →
c · www.topimplant.com.tw/?p=1964Sentence analysis (12) →
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
← Previous analysisNext analysis →Site-wide score charts

server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform