🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
中和板橋植牙權威 -康橋牙醫診所表示 — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
1
Partly supported
10
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (11 statements)
DNT-149516F71620
中和板橋植牙權威 -康橋牙醫診所表示，要想恢復外型與咬合，現今有著不少假牙方式可供大家填補，其中植牙是大眾最普遍的選擇，牙橋則是其次選項。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 康橋牙醫診所的自述、植牙為大眾最普遍選擇、牙橋為其次選項
DNT-3F208442050B
牙橋的原理及安裝過程報您知 牙橋可以使用多久？
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 牙橋原理、安裝過程，以及以時間單位回答『可以使用多久』的壽命數據。
DNT-A2E605337A19
因為不需手術，自然不需要傷口癒合時間，讓人短時間內就能藉由牙橋恢復咬合與咀嚼。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 牙橋不需手術、無傷口癒合時間、短時間恢復咬合咀嚼；證據描述的是植牙手術與植體支持義齒。
DNT-2A5C57B2A6E0
牙橋尤其重視支柱牙與齒槽骨健康，當兩側牙齒保養得好，齒槽骨也沒有萎縮的情況下，牙橋就能穩固使用。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 牙橋尤其重視支柱牙與齒槽骨健康、兩側牙齒保養良好且齒槽骨未萎縮時牙橋能穩固使用等主張
DNT-37D8F8ABB832
牙橋壽命平均來說可達5-10年，使用年限落差大的原因主要來自齒槽骨萎縮速率、清潔方式兩大因素。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 牙橋平均壽命5-10年、使用年限落差與齒槽骨萎縮速率和清潔方式有關，evidence未提及牙橋壽命或原因。
DNT-F8BBDD250B35
影響牙橋壽命因素： 1.齒槽骨萎縮速率：牙橋的構造由牙冠相連而成，沒有人工牙根。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 牙橋壽命、齒槽骨萎縮速率、牙冠相連構造、無人工牙根等皆未提及。
DNT-043716540C50
2.牙橋正確清潔：牙橋為多顆假牙連成一體，牙橋底部容易卡著食物殘渣與牙菌斑，若沒有使用特製牙線、牙間刷每日仔細清潔，更加容易形成蛀牙，對支柱牙造成侵害。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: claim 主張牙橋為多顆假牙連成一體、底部易卡食物殘渣與牙菌斑、未用特製牙線牙間刷清潔會增加蛀牙與侵害支柱牙；evidence 僅描述歐洲安養機構住民口腔健康調查，完全未提及牙橋清潔、特製牙線、牙間刷或蛀牙形成機制。
DNT-85CD48E79F6E
一旦兩側牙齒蛀牙嚴重，也意味著牙橋不再密合，需要重新製作了。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 兩側牙齒蛀牙嚴重導致牙橋不密合並需重新製作的因果宣稱未獲支持
DNT-21B18AA34001
植牙既能做到如同真牙般的咀嚼力，還有著人工牙根，能夠維持齒槽骨不萎縮。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 此病例報告中，上顎植牙追蹤數年無骨吸收且無功能問題。
DNT-2D1838C66A76
更因為有著單顆結構，清潔維護上比起牙橋更加容易，也不會連帶影響其他顆牙齒的健康，是目前最多人選用的假牙方式。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 單顆結構清潔較易、不影響其他牙齒健康、以及『最多人選用』的普及率主張，均未見於 abstract。
DNT-1BC4443B7641
只要患者缺牙處兩旁擁有健康完好的牙齒，就適合安裝牙橋。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 缺牙處兩旁牙齒健康完好即適合安裝牙橋的條件
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform