🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS

第一個病例有拔牙也有打骨釘,矯正後的照片 — sentence-by-sentence verification

台北亞緻牙醫診所 · Source page taipei-arts-dental-clinic.com.tw/case_detail.asp?id=519 ↗ · c · 5 statements verified · ← Back to analysis index

0
Provable
0
Partly supported
5
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.

🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (5 statements)

DNT-DEFB6F5914DE
案例分享 | Case Home > 案例分享 > 隱適美隱形矯正 王聿靖醫師的矯正暴牙實例 暴牙是矯正治療中數一數二常見的類型,
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 暴牙是矯正治療中數一數二常見的類型,以及王聿靖醫師的隱適美案例
DNT-814F897F18A9
第一個病例有拔牙也有打骨釘,矯正後的照片,上顎兩側各有一個小洞,是骨釘剛移除的痕跡,不過不必擔心,大概三天後,牙齦癒合起來,就看不見了。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: claim 陳述特定病例有拔牙及骨釘、矯正後上顎小洞、三天牙齦癒合等細節,但 evidence 為微創拔牙技術研究,未提及骨釘、矯正後照片、小洞或三天癒合
DNT-8766C6EEED55
第二個病例則只有拔牙,沒有打骨釘,這兩個病例雖然都是暴牙,但治療前的門牙角度和下巴位置不同,嘴唇厚度也不同,所以有不同的治療計劃。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: claim 陳述第二病例只有拔牙無骨釘,且比較兩個病例的門牙角度、下巴、嘴唇等,evidence 僅為拔牙技術研究,未涉及病例比較、骨釘或面部特徵
DNT-6C421B42B909
因為大臼齒比平常矯正拔除的小臼齒大至少1.5倍,所以要關閉這個空間是很花時間的,再加上把後面兩顆臼齒前拉,邊拉要邊控制臼齒往前傾倒的副作用,避免牙冠拉過來,牙根卻沒跟過來的冏境,將來容易產生牙周問題。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過;不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-43BF5F0039B6
    兩年多的矯正治療,讓牙齒整齊美麗,笑容更加自信,又能關閉缺牙的縫隙,解決了3顆要做植牙或假牙的煩惱和花費,對病人和醫師來說都是一個超完美的計畫。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過;不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。

🗂 Related analyses (8)

c · taipei-arts-dental-clinic.com.tw/case_detail.asp?id=517Sentence analysis (1) →
c · taipei-arts-dental-clinic.com.tw/case_detail.asp?id=629Sentence analysis (1) →
c · taipei-arts-dental-clinic.com.tw/case_detail.asp?id=617Sentence analysis (2) →
c · taipei-arts-dental-clinic.com.tw/case_detail.asp?id=648Sentence analysis (2) →
c · taipei-arts-dental-clinic.com.tw/case_detail.asp?id=638Sentence analysis (1) →
c · taipei-arts-dental-clinic.com.tw/case_detail.asp?id=630Sentence analysis (2) →
c · taipei-arts-dental-clinic.com.tw/case_detail.asp?id=621Sentence analysis (2) →
c · taipei-arts-dental-clinic.com.tw/case_detail.asp?id=646Sentence analysis (4) →
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
← Previous analysisNext analysis →Site-wide score charts

server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform