🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
阮先生 了解人工植牙 患者實例故事－人工植牙 阮… — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
3
Partly supported
5
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (8 statements)
DNT-AA7565FF9DD1
阮先生 了解人工植牙 患者實例故事－人工植牙 阮先生右下原本是45X47的牙橋，因為右下第二大臼齒有很嚴重的牙周病，導致齒槽骨嚴重破壞。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-6FDC31BB8871
比較麻煩的是，因為之前這顆牙齒是作傳統牙橋，所以當其中一顆牙齒出問題時牙橋就必須整個拆除。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 傳統牙橋在單顆牙齒出問題時必須整個拆除的臨床處置宣稱。
DNT-0F8341229845
所以與陳醫師充分討論後，決定以植牙的方式來修復缺牙的問題。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 證據支持『植體支持式固定贋復物可作為單顆或多顆缺牙的可靠治療選項』；即『以植牙方式修復缺牙』的一般可行性。
DNT-4F2FFAD3DC41
拆除牙橋，並拔除右下第二大臼齒後，將裡頭的發炎組織清除乾淨，施行齒槽骨保存術，補入骨粉及膠原蛋白並加以縫合後，可以保留原有骨頭的寬度不讓骨頭萎縮的太快。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 拆除牙橋、拔除右下第二大臼齒、清創發炎組織、齒槽骨保存術、補骨粉/膠原蛋白、保留骨寬度等具體步驟與效果均未被提及。
DNT-DE0E1445BADE
當植牙附著齒齦的量不足就容易發炎，容易塞食物，植牙的成功率也會受影響。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: evidence 廣泛提及植體相關特性與植牙失敗有關。
DNT-2412D673D332
而術後相當的成功，等待軟組織穩定後再進行植牙手術。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 術後成功與等待軟組織穩定再植牙的時序；evidence 僅探討植體扭力與邊緣骨吸收。
DNT-FD57ADB5B003
考量美觀及清潔的問題，患者是使用全瓷冠的材質，所以色澤相當的自然，尤其咬合力非常滿意，不像之前的牙橋讓他吃較韌的食物時會有無力的感覺。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 證據支持使用全瓷冠於前牙區贋復可達到理想美觀效果的部分
DNT-92BC0037FC8D
導致齒槽骨嚴重破壞 術中X光 拆除牙橋後，
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 「齒槽骨嚴重破壞」「術中X光」「拆除牙橋」均未被 evidence 提及或支持。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform