🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
這類侵襲性牙周病破壞速度是慢性牙周病的7-10倍… — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
2
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (2 statements)
DNT-8265187F7190
這類侵襲性牙周病破壞速度是慢性牙周病的7-10倍，在深入探討齒槽骨流失原因之前，先來認識支撐牙齒的關鍵地基 繼續閱讀 → 發佈於 口腔保健 , 牙科衛教 牙科衛教 , 牙齒矯正 改善牙齦外露？
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-5907981FF0BC
真的比假牙、牙橋 […] 繼續閱讀 → 發佈於 平價植牙 , 植牙知識 , 牙科衛教 口腔保健 , 牙科衛教 不洗牙後果有多可怕？
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 整個claim：植牙與假牙/牙橋的比較、不洗牙後果
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform