🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
斷裂面積大的則會建議以假牙來做修復 — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
1
Partly supported
12
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (13 statements)
DNT-93196EC9CD2D
斷裂面積大的則會建議以假牙來做修復，如斷裂部位有傷害到神經，則需要合併根管治療。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 斷裂面積大用假牙修復，以及傷及神經需根管治療的適應症
DNT-1CB01D65529E
斷裂面在牙齦下 如果牙齒斷裂面有一部分在牙齦下，要判斷牙齒留不留得住第一步通常是以牙冠牙根比來做考量。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 断裂面在牙龈下时以牙冠牙根比作为第一步考量的临床步骤
DNT-AFE37DAF0077
從斷裂面下2mm到牙齒頂端為牙冠長度，到根尖為牙根長度，牙冠牙根長度比決定牙齒的去留。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 斷裂面下2mm定義、牙冠牙根長度比、牙齒去留決策
DNT-16E3801DCE02
如果牙冠牙根比 1:1，代表你的牙冠比牙根長，可能會出現頭重腳輕的狀況，這時候就建議拔除，考慮牙橋或是植牙的治療方式。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 如果牙冠牙根比 1:1，代表你的牙冠比牙根長，可能會出現頭重腳輕的狀況，這時候就建議拔除，考慮牙橋或是植牙的治療方式。
DNT-8F6906CC70E1
從Ｘ光上就可以大致判斷牙冠牙根的比例來決定這顆牙齒的去留。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: claim中关于从X光判断牙冠牙根比例决定牙齿去留，evidence未涉及
DNT-665E6B3600E6
這時候可以考慮以植牙或是牙橋來回復功能及美觀。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 主張中「可以考慮以植牙或是牙橋來回復功能及美觀」的建議，證據未提及牙橋或一般選項比較。
DNT-3734C6658726
牙冠牙根比例對於預後的影響 正常前況下，牙冠（就是露出在牙齦外的部分）一定是比牙根（牙齦裡的部分）短的，這樣才不會頭重腳輕。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-3BF7E1F8D005
當我們牙齒斷裂，為了假牙的包覆性，會把假牙邊緣往牙根方向延伸，造成牙冠變長，牙根變短而改變牙冠牙根比，目前來說極限的比例就是1:1，大於這個比例就表示牙冠比牙根長，容易造成根基不穩，牙齒晃動，所以斷掉的牙齒能不能留，牙冠牙根的比例是重點考量之一，如果你的牙根天生比別人長，那就有更多機會保留這顆牙齒。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 牙冠牙根比1:1极限、假牙边缘延伸导致牙根变短、比例大于1:1造成牙齿晃动等具体机制
DNT-AEDE3E3002D9
如果牙冠牙根比沒有太糟的斷牙，通常可以搭配牙冠增長手術，來讓斷裂的齒質露出牙齦，在做假牙保護起來達到斷牙復形的目的。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 牙冠增長手術、斷牙復形、牙冠牙根比、假牙保護
DNT-E4EF9DE6F48D
牙冠增長術，沒有加上矯正 單純手術，將牙齒周圍的軟硬組織往牙根方向降低，露出足夠的齒質來做牙齒。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 牙冠增長術的定義與操作
DNT-193BE9C65DA2
牙冠變長，牙根變短，該顆牙齒的牙齦線比左右兩顆牙齒低，較適合用在非美觀的區域。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 牙冠变长、牙根变短、牙龈线低且适合非美观区域的临床判断
DNT-242B562AB6D4
牙冠增長術，加上矯正 在手術前搭配矯正做治療，目的是先將牙齒拉高，再將周圍軟硬組織降低，來達到與周圍牙齒牙齦線一樣高度的目的。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 牙冠增長術加矯正，目的是拉高牙齒再降低周圍軟硬組織至與周圍牙齦線同高
DNT-0D33708C3A1D
會建議使用在美觀區，除了較美觀外，牙冠牙根比例也會比單純手術的比例好，缺點是時間較長，與需要額外的矯正費用。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 使用 custom abutment 在前牙美觀區可改善美觀
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform