🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
Sentence-by-sentence verification
1
Provable
2
Partly supported
3
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (6 statements)
DNT-522164DCE235
事實上，植牙背後的判斷其實非常有邏輯——絕大多數的決策，可以被簡化成三個問題：骨頭夠不夠（補骨）、要往哪裡放（角度）、最後要長成什麼樣子（形態）。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 植牙决策可简化为三个问题：骨量、角度、形态
DNT-89801593C8A9
- 拔牙拔很久了：齒槽骨會持續萎縮，特別是橫向的寬度先消失。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 整個claim: 拔牙後齒槽骨持續萎縮且橫向寬度先消失
DNT-4CC4429621C5
- 拔牙時就有發炎或破壞：骨頭已經被細菌吃掉一塊，現場補骨幾乎是必要的。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 骨移植可以促进拔牙后骨愈合
DNT-B5E6A431B0C9
答案藏在第三個邏輯裡——牙齒的最終形態，不只取決於牙冠本身，更取決於底下骨頭的高度與牙齦的厚度。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 牙齿最终形态取决于骨头高度与牙龈厚度这一断言
DNT-349F48E21BDE
這也是為什麼「牙齦生物型（gingival biotype）」這個概念在植牙計畫中越來越被重視——薄型牙齦的人，醫師會傾向多補一點軟組織、多做一些保護；厚型牙齦的人容錯率比較高，相對單純。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 牙龈生物型分为薄型和厚型
DNT-688D9EAD6291
植牙的成功率確實很高，但植體和真牙一樣，需要長期維護。
✅ Supported by literature
Supported scope: 植牙成功率高达4/5，且需要长期随访护理
🗂 Related analyses (7)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform