🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
news_detail_40.htm — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
1
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (1 statements)
DNT-437DAB384085
【轉貼YAHOO新聞】 植牙原始設計本身就是無法讓患者拿下來清潔,再怎麼努力刷牙都刷不到牙齦 與植體縫隙的食渣,導致許多患者怎麼植了不到兩年又拔掉重新植牙, 最終面臨 無法再植牙,不僅嚴重影響到患者生活品質甚至連身體免疫系統都必須集中消滅 口腔的細菌,對身體造成極大的危害,因此林醫師呼籲民眾若要植牙應當選擇可 以 拔下來清潔 的植牙結構才能使患者能夠真正有效的把牙齒清潔乾淨,才不會一 直面臨必須拔掉植牙重植的風險。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 植牙原始設計無法取下清潔、刷不到縫隙、兩年內拔掉重植、應選擇可取下清潔的結構
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform