🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
有人植牙美齒，卻忽略牙周病，反而造成嚴重口臭 — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
4
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (4 statements)
DNT-9ABACDB7B6EB
有人植牙美齒，卻忽略牙周病，反而造成嚴重口臭，嚇跑女友！
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 有人植牙美齒，卻忽略牙周病，反而造成嚴重口臭，嚇跑女友！
DNT-D0FCAD892A52
檢查發現男子半年前植了9顆牙，但植體和本身的自然牙都沒好好保養，牙周發炎出血，導致陣陣異味，最後只好拔掉植牙，先治療牙周病，再花錢重新植牙，還得多花費50萬元。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-0FED4822F713
牙齦紅腫牙根外露，這是一名55歲婦產科醫師的牙齒，明明半年前才植牙，但又有牙周病，導致嘴裡散發臭味嚇跑女友，原先植牙的牙醫師沒先改善他的牙周病，也沒提醒他植牙後，要持續維持口腔健康，結果牙周病惡化併發骨膜炎，3顆植體搖搖晃晃，只好把原先植牙拆掉，治療牙周病後，再重新植牙，植牙沒治好牙周病，結果又花了50萬元。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-84D56EB3C1CF
醫師也提醒相較自然牙，植牙雖然不會有蛀牙和根管問題，但如果有牙周病，會比自然牙更容易腐壞，民眾要植牙最好找大醫院或有口碑的醫師，徹底做好口腔篩檢再植牙，否則容易白花冤枉錢。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 整個宣稱：植牙與自然牙比較、牙周病導致更容易腐壞、建議找大醫院或口碑醫師、徹底篩檢
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform