🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
全口重建-all-on-4 — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
2
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (2 statements)
DNT-9D646339A0BB
三種植牙方式的比較 All-on-4 / 傳統植牙 / 活動式假牙 All-on-4 快速完成牙齒重建 可減少大範圍補骨 接近真牙的咬合力 適合對象：全口缺牙、活動假牙配戴不適、齒槽骨萎縮嚴重不適合補骨的患者 傳統植牙 重建牙齒恢復功能 彷如真牙，
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-7073EBAFE73C
成功率高 咬合功能尤佳 適合對象：單顆缺牙或局部缺牙者 活動式假牙 療程費用親民 不需手術，
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 活動式假牙的成功率、咬合功能、費用親民、不需手術及適用對象，evidence 未提及。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform