🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
Sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
2
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (2 statements)
DNT-64981B09D5CB
主要治療方式： 傳統根管治療完的牙齒需要做牙套式的假牙包覆，像是幫牙齒戴安全帽一樣增強結構強度，由於黏著技術及陶瓷材料發展的進步，現在可以用更保守性的方式進行修復，也就是『覆蓋式陶瓷嵌體』。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 根管治療後需牙套包覆、黏著與陶瓷材料進展、覆蓋式陶瓷嵌體等修復方式，全部未被 evidence 支持。
DNT-A66DB6A311BD
它不用像傳統牙套式360度環形修磨的方式，犧牲掉更多的牙齒結構，使得牙齒生命值再降低，覆蓋式陶瓷嵌體，僅需把凹洞位置填平，中心視情況以『玻璃纖維釘柱』強化結構，降低咬合面約莫1mm-1.5mm的厚度，即可製作覆蓋於整個咬合面的陶瓷補綴物、兼顧強度及降低牙齒修磨量的補綴方式。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform