🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
Sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
2
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (2 statements)
DNT-6DD2E87E7149
牙況： 患者求診時，第二大臼齒崩裂，想尋求補綴方式，由於齒質結構本身剩餘非常少，扣除原本中心的銀粉填補材，剩餘牙齒結構過薄，若使用傳統牙套式（360度）環形修磨的假牙，則會犧牲掉更多的 牙齒結構，使得牙齒生命值再降低。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-893AADCC913F
主要治療方式： 也因為其缺損延伸到牙肉底下，需做『牙冠增長術』才能讓缺損邊界線露出來，得以修補完整。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 未支持缺損延伸至牙肉底下需做牙冠增長術、讓缺損邊界露出並修補；evidence 為陶瓷牙冠內端點開腔模擬與有限元素分析，非臨床治療指引。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform