🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
Sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
8
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (8 statements)
DNT-ABA8FC81D9B8
2022 Post category: 張庭豪醫師案例-全瓷冠 / 張庭豪醫師案例-前牙美學 / 成功案例 / 美觀重建案例 Continue Reading 前牙仿真全瓷冠案例07 前牙仿真全瓷冠案例06 Post author: JasonT Post published: 16 8 月,
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-6FF70E595972
2022 Post category: 張庭豪醫師案例-全瓷冠 / 張庭豪醫師案例-前牙美學 / 成功案例 / 美觀重建案例 「門牙區仿真陶瓷假牙重建」 牙況： 患者的兩顆門牙一直困擾著... Continue Reading 前牙仿真全瓷冠案例06 下顎前牙貼片及全瓷冠案例05 Post author: JasonT Post published: 16 8 月,
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-C5FD85D03630
2022 Post category: 張庭豪醫師案例-全瓷冠 / 張庭豪醫師案例-前牙美學 / 成功案例 / 美觀重建案例 牙況： 病人因下顎門牙區不美觀、不好清潔，
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-965B8B059B4D
2022 Post category: 張庭豪醫師案例-全瓷冠 / 張庭豪醫師案例-前牙美學 / 成功案例 / 美觀重建案例 「遮色」-舊全瓷冠更新。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-14333BC0662B
2022 Post category: 張庭豪醫師案例-全瓷冠 / 張庭豪醫師案例-前牙美學 / 成功案例 / 美觀重建案例 牙況： 兩顆門牙佔據頭部的比例非常的小；
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-4F97B4A6EFED
2022 Post category: 張庭豪醫師案例-全瓷冠 / 張庭豪醫師案例-前牙美學 / 成功案例 / 美觀重建案例 牙況： 患者不滿意原本的笑容，
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-8C37D6D8DCA4
2022 Post category: 張庭豪醫師案例-全瓷冠 / 張庭豪醫師案例-前牙美學 / 成功案例 / 美觀重建案例 患者： 鍾弟弟，
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-8BFA120950DA
牙況： 門牙因為意外撞斷了，牙齒剩... Continue Reading 前牙仿真全瓷冠案例01 兒童口腔預防健保服務相關公告(09/01起) Post author: JasonT Post published: 16 8 月, 2022 Post category: 門診公告 因衛福部來函修正醫事服務機構辦理口腔預防保健服務注意事項，如... Continue Reading 兒童口腔預防健保服務相關公告(09/01起) Go to the previous page 1 2 近期文章 新竹植牙｜光明牙醫祝您2026父親節快樂!
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform