🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
Sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
2
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (2 statements)
DNT-A062FD824356
2022 Post category: 全口重建案例 / 張庭豪醫師案例-活動假牙 / 成功案例 / 活動假牙案例 患者： 陳婆婆，
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-5C19D30F49EC
牙況： 因舊的活動假牙已經不合... Continue Reading 全口活動假牙案例01 全口重建案例分享 Post author: JasonT Post published: 14 8 月, 2021 Post category: 全口重建案例 / 成功案例 / 溫智博醫師案例 患者：蔡先生，40歲牙況：患者有咀嚼功能上的問題，來檢查並有... Continue Reading 全口重建案例分享 近期文章 新竹植牙｜光明牙醫祝您2026父親節快樂!
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform