🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
Sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
1
Partly supported
4
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (5 statements)
DNT-500C9C35939E
在過往，其中金屬假牙是人工鑄造，假牙密合度差，食物更容易的卡在看不到的縫隙處，細菌侵蝕根管治療後的脆弱真牙，也因為沒有牙髓神經痛的機制，等到發現的時候已經是真牙蛀蝕嚴重，可能會需要拔牙的情況了。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 金屬假牙人工鑄造、密合度差、食物卡在縫隙、細菌侵蝕根管治療後真牙、缺乏牙髓神經痛、延遲發現與拔牙的敘述
DNT-FB71880AC440
現今的科技發展之下，全瓷冠假牙因為生物相容性高、密合度佳，較不用擔心密合度差導致蛀牙情況。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 全瓷冠假牙的生物相容性、密合度佳、密合度差導致蛀牙風險等所有主張
DNT-4820A0130A88
然而，一顆假牙或牙橋要價不斐，拆開難道就不能夠再裝回了。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 假牙或牙橋費用昂貴、拆除後能否重新裝回
DNT-111C10338B5F
醫師會在拆掉牙套後，如果真正發現假牙蛀牙，就必須清除感染物質， 檢查真牙剩下的結構及損壞位置，來決定牙套是否要重做喔 。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-E5E93EDB1CBC
平時清潔要做好，凡是發現有異味，盡早回診避免真牙遭受嚴重侵害，一方面是確保牙根能盡量保留，另一方面是重製牙套的可能性也比較低。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: evidence支持矯正治療期間應持續例行預防性牙科照護
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform