🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
齒顎矯正案例1 患者主訴是想改善上顎正中門牙像兔… — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
9
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (9 statements)
DNT-B4EEF6C66354
齒顎矯正案例1 患者主訴是想改善上顎正中門牙像兔寶寶門牙的感覺，
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 整个claim关于具体患者主诉的案例描述，未在证据中得到支持
DNT-C26CA1D7C8CC
矯正前 矯正後 蔡雨靜醫師與患者討論治療計畫時，提供了2個拔牙的方案，方案1是依一般矯正治療方式，拔除第一小臼齒，方案2是拔除左上第一大臼齒(先前已蛀牙、有大體積的填補物)。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-8FAA2D6BF77E
後來患者選擇了方案1，另外在完成矯正治療後，在左上第一大臼齒做全瓷冠假牙，以增加牙齒強度。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement
DNT-EFD6AAB5474C
矯正前 矯正後 關鍵字：台中,北區,北屯區,牙醫,矯正,台中矯正,口碑,推薦,權威,專家,價格,價錢,費用,詮品,牙醫,詮品牙醫 齒顎矯正案例2 患者本身很恐懼做牙科治療，是經由朋友介紹來找蔡雨靜醫師諮詢。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 整句claim包含具体案例、医师及关键词，属机构宣传，与evidence比较两种矫正器焦虑水平的RCT无关
DNT-361B2B277B1D
因此本案例採拔牙的治療方式，拔除左右上顎第一小臼齒後，開始黏著矯正器，把齒列排列整齊，關閉空間同時把前牙後退。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 整体claim：拔除第一前磨牙后粘矫正器进行正畸
DNT-B06D8917C52E
矯正前 矯正後 矯正前 矯正後 齒顎矯正案例3 患者希望醫師把外翻的虎牙排列整齊，並改善上下排牙齒中線沒對正、顏面不對稱的問題。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: claim 描述具體矯正案例（虎牙、中線不對稱），evidence 為 clear aligner 的 Delphi 共識研究
DNT-7FE93B8E48A1
本案例採拔牙方式治療，利用拔牙得到的空間把賸餘的牙齒排列整齊，並把中線對正。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: claim描述拔牙后利用间隙排列牙齿并对正中线的具体案例，evidence评价微创拔除上颌智齿的效果，未涉及排列牙齿或中线对正
DNT-6E6909F71986
醫師建議患者採拔牙的治療計畫，拔除牙齒後騰出空間，把不整齊的前牙排列整齊後，賸餘的空間用於讓前牙後退。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: claim描述拔牙创造空间使前牙后退，evidence为微创拔除上颌第三磨牙的研究，不涉及前牙移动。
DNT-67AF66ECF112
矯正前 矯正後 矯正前 矯正後 經蔡雨靜醫師建議，本案例採拔牙治療計畫，以產生空間讓右上犬齒萌出，同時讓齒列排列整齊，深咬的情形也獲得改善，上下排門牙的水平及垂直覆蓋回復正常。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: claim描述拔牙治疗计划用于犬齿萌出及改善深咬，evidence为微创拔除上颌第三磨牙的研究，不涉及犬齿或前牙排列。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform