🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
Sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
3
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (3 statements)
DNT-15F50360C075
先生逝世時，他的植牙仍然完好穩定使用超過 40 年。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-E367865C45B6
Nobel Biocare 與 Paulo Maló 教授攜手研發 All-on-4® 全口速定® 治療概念，專為全口無牙或骨質嚴重不足的患者量身設計。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: claim 提及 Nobel Biocare 與 Paulo Maló 教授研發 All-on-4® 概念，但 evidence 研究六顆植體立即負載方案，未提及 All-on-4® 或研發者
DNT-D3932AB0CA16
這項技術透過特殊的斜置植體設計，避開補骨手術，讓患者能夠更快、更穩固地擁有固定式假牙。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: claim 描述「斜置植體設計避開補骨手術」，但 evidence 僅調查患者對植牙與補骨手術的觀點，未提及斜置植體設計或避開補骨手術
🗂 Related analyses (2)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform