🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
Sentence-by-sentence verification
1
Provable
2
Partly supported
10
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (13 statements)
DNT-27BE12D91D43
這種材質組合讓士卓曼植體兼具 高強度、優異的骨整合能力與長期穩定性,是許多高端植牙方案的首選!
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 材質組合、高強度、優異骨整合、長期穩定性、高端植牙首選
DNT-1B107A659157
學會)是一個非營利性組織,成立於1980年,致力於推動植牙學術研究與教育。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過;不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-323A79B458C4
A:植牙會搭配局部麻醉,過程中幾乎無痛,部分患者甚至表示比拔牙還輕鬆。
✅ Supported by literature
Supported scope: 植牙比拔牙疼痛感更低
DNT-8C53AC2FD7DB
只要身體狀況穩定、骨質條件允許,60~80歲長者一樣能成功植牙。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過;不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-8C92B006FFD0
劍橋牙醫也提供顴骨植體或All-on-4/6等技術,專為骨質不足或全口缺牙的患者設計。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 劍橋牙醫提供顴骨植體或All-on-4/6技術,專為骨質不足或全口缺牙患者設計
DNT-5AB0EC705C04
A:植牙使用的是純鈦植體,與人體骨頭高度相容,不會像器官移植那樣出現排斥反應。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 植體與骨頭整合
DNT-C2E9290163E0
但抽菸、糖尿病控制差、嚴重牙周病等會提高風險,需個別評估。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 牙周病與糖尿病之間的雙向關係
DNT-885294C662B1
費用會依照位置、材料、骨質條件而不同,一顆植牙價格從7萬~10萬不等。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過;不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-BC733C58BAD1
相比長期更換活動假牙或鄰牙被磨損,植牙是耐用且經濟的選擇。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 植牙相比活動假牙或牙橋是耐用且經濟的選擇
DNT-CD95E2896CB6
若患者骨頭條件允許,劍橋牙醫也提供「當日拔牙即植牙」的快速方案,減少等待。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: claim 提及「劍橋牙醫」提供「當日拔牙即植牙」方案,但 evidence 僅探討自體新鮮脫礦牙齒移植在植牙手術中的臨床應用,未提及任何特定診所或「當日拔牙即植牙」方案
DNT-EC109D8AEDF8
A:如果清潔得當、定期回診追蹤,植牙可以使用15年以上,甚至終身。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: claim 宣稱植牙可使用15年以上甚至終身,但 evidence 追蹤最長10年,未提供15年或終身數據
DNT-C83955C71A8B
A:植牙是「不磨鄰牙、無需拿上拿下、像真牙一樣咀嚼」的方案;而活動假牙會晃動、影響發音,固定牙橋則需磨兩側健康牙。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 植牙不磨鄰牙、無需拿上拿下、像真牙咀嚼;活動假牙晃動影響發音;固定牙橋需磨健康牙
DNT-717F5B196488
長期來看,植牙能保護其他牙齒,是更穩固、舒適、自然的選擇。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 植牙能保護其他牙齒、更穩固、舒適、自然的長期選擇
🗂 Related analyses (2)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform