🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
Sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
3
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (3 statements)
DNT-808418557334
當牙周袋過深、反覆腫脹流血，單靠洗牙與深層刮治已無法穩定病情時，醫師便可能會評估是否需要進一步進行翻瓣手術。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 「牙周袋過深、反覆腫脹流血、洗牙/深層刮治無效後評估翻瓣手術」的完整命題；evidence僅陳述SRP對根管治療牙齒牙周袋的改善效果
DNT-882F071D23B9
即使是在符合健保條件的醫療院所， 以下項目一律屬於自費 ，不論在哪裡治療： 額外耗材與再生材料：骨粉、再生膜、牙周再生相關材料 先進或輔助技術：水雷射、特殊微創或輔助器械。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 健保/自費給付分類、骨粉/再生膜/牙周再生材料、水雷射/特殊微創或輔助器械之『一律自費』宣稱；證據僅評論雷射治療牙周炎之臨床效益爭議，未涉及任何費用或健保規定。
DNT-9DAE94C946AD
當非手術治療（如深層清潔、牙周刮治）無法有效控制病情時，醫師才會評估是否需要進一步進行翻瓣手術， 並非所有牙周病患者都一定需要做到這一步 。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform