🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS

假牙材質 主要可以分為:金屬牙冠、金屬瓷牙冠 — sentence-by-sentence verification

亞德牙醫診所 · Source page artdental.tw/denture-material · c · 6 statements verified · ← Back to analysis index

0
Provable
1
Partly supported
5
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page.

🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (6 statements)

DNT-E547883CBC56
假牙材質 主要可以分為:金屬牙冠、金屬瓷牙冠、全瓷冠、全鋯冠。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 假牙材质分类(金属牙冠、金属瓷牙冠、全瓷冠、全鋯冠)
DNT-8D35196C05B0
一般金屬牙冠價格在四者中最便宜,但是價格主要跟使用的金屬有關,若是使用貴金屬,不僅價差可能是原本的數倍,有時候可能比全瓷冠還貴!
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 整句關於金屬牙冠價格比較的斷言未在 evidence 中提及
DNT-F341A31EAACB
另外金屬牙冠外觀較不擬真,如果現在有人要使用,多半用在臼齒區,因為其在四者中較耐咬合力。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 金属牙冠外观不逼真、用于臼齿区、耐咬合力
DNT-56A93251081A
金屬瓷牙冠跟金屬牙冠的差別在外觀附上了瓷粉,比較雅觀,承受力稍微不如金屬牙冠,但是還是優於全瓷冠,一般也適用在臼齒區,價格稍微比金屬牙冠高一些些。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
[Clinical evaluation on aesthetic effect of custom pressable metal ceramic abutment for dental implant restoration in anterior zone].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2013 · PMID 23991588
Supported scope: evidence 支持金屬瓷牙冠(custom pressable metal ceramic abutment)可改善美觀,但僅限於前牙區。
DNT-A0E06C342BB8
全瓷冠一般用在門牙區,最美觀、擬真也最貴,早期相當脆弱,對咬合承受能力差,但是現在的話科技進步,雖然承受力不如金屬牙冠,但是硬度已經勝過真牙。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 整句關於全瓷冠使用於門牙、美觀價格、早期脆弱及硬度勝過真牙的斷言未獲支持
DNT-A5C271717DB4
全鋯冠算是一種較新的材質,價格比全瓷冠高,可以算是全瓷冠的一種,擬真程度跟全瓷冠不相上下,但是硬度更高,一般也是用在門牙區。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 全鋯冠的材質特性、價格比較、擬真程度、硬度及使用區域等所有主張

🗂 Related analyses (4)

c · artdental.twSentence analysis (2) →
c · artdental.tw/knowledge-about-dental-implantSentence analysis (17) →
c · artdental.tw/the-process-of-dental-implantSentence analysis (17) →
c · artdental.tw/部落客分享|【牙齒】冷光美白恢復潔白的牙齒不Sentence analysis (6) →
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
← Previous analysisNext analysis →Site-wide score charts

server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform