🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
可能的風險與不適合的情況 3D 齒雕的主要限制有… — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
1
Partly supported
7
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (8 statements)
DNT-06E80E5DC0A1
可能的風險與不適合的情況 3D 齒雕的主要限制有四個： 需要一定的剩餘齒質才能做、瓷塊在強咬合力下有崩裂風險、黏著邊緣若清潔不良會二次蛀牙、缺損過大或已根管治療的牙齒通常不適合 。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-6DCCC647D444
缺損範圍過大 已做過根管治療 嚴重夜間磨牙或緊咬 牙齒已有裂紋 會不會崩裂？
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 整個問題：缺損、根管治療、磨牙、裂紋是否導致崩裂
DNT-1B508C1EFECE
它保留的齒質比牙套多，但也因此有幾個先天條件。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 保留齒質比牙套多、先天條件
DNT-CEF99AB0FAAD
缺損範圍過大 蛀掉或崩掉的範圍大到剩餘牙壁無法承托瓷塊時，全瓷冠整顆包覆會比較穩定。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 全瓷冠在缺損範圍大時較穩定的主張未被證據提及
DNT-7E93B7B23D9F
已做過根管治療 根管治療後的牙齒失去養分供應，結構較脆。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 根管治療後牙齒因薄牙本質壁而易發生頸部折斷（結構較脆）
DNT-1BF6F2C1464B
後牙根管治療後多半建議做牙冠保護 ，齒雕通常不是首選。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 後牙、多半建議牙冠、齒雕非首選
DNT-B9DAA0898293
不適合齒雕，不代表只能拔牙或做最貴的選項。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 不適合齒雕的替代選項（拔牙或最貴選項）之聲明
DNT-9ECA76D1B8C5
缺損大或已根管：全瓷冠 缺損範圍大、牙尖需要保護，或已經做過根管治療的牙齒，全瓷冠整顆包覆能分散咬合力，穩定性較好。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: claim 主張全瓷冠能分散咬合力、穩定性較好，但 evidence 為系統性回顧，結論為無充分證據比較冠與填補物之效果，未提及咬合力分散或穩定性。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform