🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
Sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
2
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (2 statements)
DNT-CDCB6B2899A5
臨床經驗 ：確認醫師執業年資和累積的植牙案例，經驗豐富的醫師能更精準地評估口腔狀況，並提供適合的治療計畫。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 醫師執業年資、累積植牙案例數、經驗豐富醫師更能精準評估口腔狀況並提供適合治療計畫等宣稱，均未被證據提及。
DNT-C2EB4ACD0ABA
全口重建費用比較表 項目 All-on-4/6 傳統全口植牙 活動假牙 治療費用 60~80萬 動輒上百萬 5-10萬 治療時間 最快單日完成 數個月、數年 單日完成 使用年限 10-20年 15-25年 5年內有機率不敷使用 上表為一日全口重建的All-on-4/6、傳統全口植牙、活動假牙的費用區間、手術治療時間、使用年限，提供給大家做參考。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform