🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
#14419 — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
1
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (1 statements)
DNT-2ACBDC6AD123
上一篇 回列表 下一篇 之前有位阿姨來找台揚醫師植牙 65歲以上還能預防蛀牙?
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 『上一篇/回列表/下一篇』、診所個案宣稱、65歲以上族群與蛀牙預防之間的關係均未被證據支持;abstract中65%是牙本質無機物比例,非年齡
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform