🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
Sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
1
Partly supported
5
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (6 statements)
DNT-35AD1990D1D3
抽菸： 抽菸對牙周病的影響非常大，也會對牙周治療產生負面影響。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 整個 claim：吸菸對牙周病影響大及對牙周治療有負面影響。
DNT-28F42A441C65
壓力與內分泌： 當病人處在壓力比較大的狀態，或是在懷孕、青春期以及停經期間，牙齦跟牙周組織容易紅腫、疼痛，也更容易牙齦出血。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-BBF517FFC88F
系統性疾病： 尤其是糖尿病與心血管疾病，與牙周病往往是互相影響，牙周病是一種慢性發炎的疾病，長期牙周病的病人有糖尿病與心血管疾病的比率都比一般人高一倍以上。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 證據直接支持：糖尿病患者發生牙周病的風險增加三倍；且糖尿病患者的牙周病與心肌梗塞、中風等心血管事件相關，支持糖尿病/心血管疾病與牙周病互相影響的方向。
DNT-632664D43A2F
牙周病的治療 牙周病治療的第一步會先從非手術性的治療開始，在這個階段我們會進行： 發炎控制 這個環節包含了深度洗牙、老舊贗復物（就是假牙、牙套、牙橋）的評估與重建、蛀牙填補等，目的就是要移除窩洞裡的細菌與經年累月的牙菌斑，有些老舊的、磨損的、甚至可能已經被咬壞不合的贗復物，會在跟病人溝通後移除重製，避免留下難以清潔的表面或死角。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-196E59161090
如果此時牙周組織恢復健康，那就可以進入穩定觀察追蹤的階段，安排定期回診；但是如果效果並不理想，就會跟病人溝通討論進行第二階段的牙周治療，也就是手術階段。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 整個 claim：牙周恢復健康後進入觀察追蹤與定期回診，效果不理想則進行第二階段手術等臨床處置流程。
DNT-F04DC08457BD
不過值得一提的是，若是病人在治療完狀況改善以後，就不再回診也沒有好好刷牙，牙周病與牙周破壞是會捲土重來的，此時就又需要再重新開始一輪的牙周病治療。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 宣稱中的治療後改善、回診、刷牙、牙周病復發與重新治療皆未在 evidence 中提及；evidence 描述牙周病特徵、骨破壞與 RANKL 機制。
🗂 Related analyses (1)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform