🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
經過楊醫師的評估後說 : — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
1
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (1 statements)
DNT-0A450EE39757
」 經過楊醫師的評估後說 :「 我們只需要花14付的隱形牙套，不用到五個月就可以達到很美觀的效果囉，而且選擇14付的方案也可以省下許多預算。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: claim 為特定醫師對個案的宣稱（14付隱形牙套、五個月內美觀效果、省預算），evidence 為體外研究探討老化對五種矯正器抗拉強度與表面狀況的影響，完全無關。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform