🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
case.php — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
2
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (2 statements)
DNT-B892EAEAA01B
關閉拔牙空間 ● 治療時間: 3年5個月 ● 治療結果: 解決齒列擁擠,
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 『關閉拔牙空間』、治療時間3年5個月、治療結果解決齒列擁擠等具體療程宣稱,均未被證據陳述。
DNT-7363208A68D8
將第二大臼齒及智齒前移關閉拔牙空間 ● 治療時間: 3年 ● 治療結果: 解決暴牙及開咬,
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 將第二大臼齒及智齒前移關閉拔牙空間的治療時間與結果,證據未提及此操作
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform