🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
Sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
1
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (1 statements)
DNT-B5236E073B30
Post author: JasonT Post published: 2014 年 12 月 15 日 Post category: 最新消息 植牙資訊愈來越多，民眾反而看得越來愈糊塗，植牙風險依舊是大部分人不敢植牙的原因，根據台灣醫療改革基金會公開的資料顯示，植牙風險造成的醫療爭議已躍居牙科醫療糾紛的首位，比例超達37%，然而，人工植牙的技術貢獻卻難以抹滅，當植牙需求發生時，我們應當思考的是，如何減少植牙風險！
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform