🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
Sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
2
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (2 statements)
DNT-DDAE9ED89AE9
治療期間，因配戴上顎的臨時活動假牙覺得不穩固之外，也因為敏感而在戴假牙時有反嘔現象，更抱怨進食時食物味道變得平淡。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 上顎臨時活動假牙不穩固、敏感導致反嘔、進食味道變淡等患者主訴，證據完全未提及
DNT-F045E98EE232
Post author: JasonT Post published: 2020 年 8 月 5 日 Post category: 最新消息 台灣已邁入高齡社會，年長者因缺牙造成的飲食不便，往往成為生活中最苦惱的事。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform