🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
Sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
2
Partly supported
3
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (5 statements)
DNT-E54BF4B05C57
傳統假牙VS人工植牙 傳統假牙 人工植牙 骨質保留程度 需於缺牙兩側搭牙橋製作固定假牙，會磨損健康牙骨質，齒槽骨及牙周組織易萎縮。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 傳統假牙需磨損健康牙骨質、齒槽骨及牙周組織易萎縮等比較性宣稱；本文獻未提及牙橋或傳統假牙對骨質的影響
DNT-C125263F7E58
植牙牙冠透光度、色澤、形狀皆依照自然牙製作，型態較為擬真。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 植牙牙冠透光度、色澤、形狀依自然牙製作及型態擬真等宣稱，均未被支持。
DNT-7A58C32AACFC
需於術前進行完整評估，確認植牙條件，並研擬完善植牙計畫；需要醫師豐富經驗與完善治療設備，困難度較高。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 植牙術前需進行放射學評估，以確定齒槽脊高度、寬度與輪廓；此部分由 evidence 直接支持。
DNT-702197AE4283
植體、設備、治療時間與技術成本高，植牙費用較高。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 植體、設備、治療時間、技術成本以及植牙費用較高的因果與價格比較
DNT-0B9A1939BD76
康橋植牙中心周安平院長呼籲，臨床常見配戴假牙多年的患者，因為假牙不好咬合、使用上有異物感而有咀嚼障礙，連帶使得胃腸消化功能變差、無法吸收營養，而有過瘦、氣色不佳等健康問題，需要重新拆除假牙接受植牙治療。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: 配戴假牙者可能出現假牙穩定度、固位或咀嚼疼痛等口腔功能問題。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform