🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS

然而,植牙的人工牙根直接與骨頭緊密結合 — sentence-by-sentence verification

康橋牙醫診所 · Source page www.topimplant.com.tw/denture-broken ↗ · c · 6 statements verified · ← Back to analysis index

0
Provable
1
Partly supported
5
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.

🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (6 statements)

DNT-9AF79BA0EBC4
康橋 板橋牙醫 表示, 植牙 再好再貴,永遠都比不上真牙,天然真牙咀嚼時牙齒周圍有牙周韌帶,扮演緩衝避震的角色,能緩和真牙牙根承受的咬合力道。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Osseoperception following dental implant treatment: A systematic review.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2022 · PMID 34911146
Supported scope: 植體與自然牙相比觸覺功能較低(主動與被動閾值較高),即植牙的觸覺敏感度不如真牙。
DNT-AAF0A737F36B
然而,植牙的人工牙根直接與骨頭緊密結合,缺少牙周韌帶富彈性的緩衝中介,假牙與食物、齒槽骨「硬碰硬」,每次咀嚼時承受的咬合力到較大,日積月累下來,假牙破損、假牙斷裂的機率也較高。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 植牙缺少牙周韌帶緩衝、咬合力較大、假牙破損斷裂機率較高的機制推論,證據未提及。
DNT-CCFD3C4F5A24
延伸閱讀: 【植牙壽命Q&A】植牙可以用多久?
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 植牙可用多久/植牙壽命之命題未被處理;evidence 僅探討低能量雷射對植體穩定度的影響。
DNT-2AFF6015A9F3
植牙、磨牙、愛吃硬食物 都跟假牙破損假牙斷裂大有關係 此外,在全鋯冠尚未問世前,過往使用的假牙材質大多為金屬附燒瓷牙,內層金屬支架外結燒上牙齒顏色的陶瓷,燒結陶瓷本身強度僅與琺瑯質相當,但在植牙缺乏緩衝機制的狀態下, 平時咬合力道較大、有磨牙或緊咬牙根習慣或是愛吃堅硬食物的患者,長期使用下,外層燒陶瓷咬崩咬裂,假牙破損、假牙斷裂的狀況,確實有可能發生 。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 植牙、磨牙、愛吃硬食物與假牙破損斷裂有關,以及金屬附燒瓷牙外層陶瓷在植牙缺乏緩衝下可能咬崩咬裂等主張
DNT-F0284BAB1E29
全鋯冠假牙由二氧化鋯材質一體成形精密切削,假牙強度遠高於真牙琺瑯質,耐磨耐咬、堅固耐用,外觀貼近牙齒顏色,也可染色創造晶瑩透亮的效果, 不僅大幅降低假牙破損、假牙斷裂的狀況,單純用於製作牙冠套,也可減少修磨牙齒的量,保留珍貴齒質,有百利而無一害 。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 全鋯冠材質、一體成形切削、強度優於琺瑯質、耐磨耐咬、染色美觀、降低斷裂、減少修牙量及無害等全句宣稱
DNT-0178222C5DAB
慎選優良牙醫診所最重要 康橋 板橋牙醫 表示,對於有長期磨牙或緊咬牙冠習慣的民眾,就醫時務必告知醫師,可事先給予咬合板不只保護假牙,也能保護真牙。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 康橋板橋牙醫的機構說法、磨牙或緊咬牙冠患者應告知醫師、咬合板保護假牙與真牙等宣稱,未被 evidence 提及。

🗂 Related analyses (8)

c · www.topimplant.com.tw/228holidaySentence analysis (1) →
c · www.topimplant.com.tw/denture-adhesiveSentence analysis (2) →
c · www.topimplant.com.tw/dental-bridge-care-expiry-dateSentence analysis (10) →
c · www.topimplant.com.tw/denture-cleaningSentence analysis (4) →
c · www.topimplant.com.tw/dental-bridge-cariesSentence analysis (13) →
c · www.topimplant.com.tw/denture-age-limitSentence analysis (2) →
c · www.topimplant.com.tw/denture-assessmentSentence analysis (19) →
c · www.topimplant.com.tw/lose-front-toothSentence analysis (5) →
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
← Previous analysisNext analysis →Site-wide score charts

server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform