🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
一般牙齒美白大致區分為兩種，一種為冷光美白 — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
1
Partly supported
3
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (4 statements)
DNT-202C9F9C8825
一般牙齒美白大致區分為兩種，一種為冷光美白，一種為居家美白，不過不論是哪一種，都不是算永久性的治療，如果需求為永久性的保持效果，可用美白陶瓷貼片來做處理，在此篇暫且不談。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-FABBF5050501
冷光美白：所謂冷光美白，是民眾需到診所，由醫師先上一層牙齦保護膠，然後再將濃度較高的美白藥劑均勻的塗在牙齒表面，就像是幫牙齒敷面膜一樣，療程時間大約40-50分鐘，在療程內，會使用藍光照射在牙齒表面，加速自由基與色素的反應，達到迅速美白的效果，這也是為何稱為『冷光』美白的原因。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-4EDCF3B328A6
冷光美白的最大優勢是效果迅速，可以在一個小時左右的治療時間使牙齒煥然一新，對於有立即性的需求的民眾最為適合。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 冷光美白、效果迅速、一小時內煥然一新、適合立即性需求民眾，均未被 evidence 提及。
DNT-217959A55096
居家美白：既然稱為『居家』，也就是由醫師取模幫民眾製作專屬個人的藥劑牙托，並教導使用的方法，由民眾在家自行將濃度較低的藥劑擠入牙托上並戴入口中，利用晚上睡覺時戴8小時，大約持續1～2星期，如達到預期的效果就可停止。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: Evidence directly asserts that at-home bleaching required 4–6 weeks to participant satisfaction, directly conflicting with the claim's 1–2 weeks.
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform