🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
第二個問題是兩顆側牙門也有不良的牙冠 — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
4
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (4 statements)
DNT-E89680B38AA8
第二個問題是兩顆側牙門也有不良的牙冠，導致美觀比較不理想。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 特定患者兩顆側門牙存在不良牙冠並因此影響美觀的具體情況，未在 evidence 中被提及或支持。
DNT-97D1B83B6E53
依照目前條件來做的話美觀上會比較妥協，因此建議王小姐做前牙五顆的全瓷冠。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 王小姐個案、目前條件美觀妥協、建議前牙五顆全瓷冠等個別化醫囑均未見於摘要
DNT-A8A62D358C8B
再使用全瓷冠將假牙做修復，修復之後改善前牙的角度以及色澤的部份，全瓷冠由於沒有金屬，因此在清潔和光線折射的美感是非常的理想。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 全瓷冠沒有金屬、清潔與光線折射美感理想、改善前牙角度與色澤
DNT-953DA3BD5A84
術前照 可看出之前假牙邊緣有不密合的牙套 術後照 經過重新修型、印模，已看不到牙齦變色的部分 經過兩個部分的治療，王小姐表示新製作的假牙在美觀度以及清潔上都比之前好很多，對於結果非常滿意，十分感謝黃醫師精湛的醫術。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 術前假牙邊緣不密合、牙齦變色消退、王小姐對美觀與清潔之評價及感謝醫師等內容皆無證據支持。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform