🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
若有相似情況，我們建議需裝戴假牙 — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
7
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (7 statements)
DNT-BB052197409C
若有相似情況，我們建議需裝戴假牙，以維持正常的生活與進食行為，康德台北全口重建療程（ALL ON 4與ALL ON 6全口植牙）分為ALL ON 4與ALL ON 6植牙，分別為以4或6顆特殊植體，利用力學支撐起全口假牙，恢復咀嚼功能、還您一個享用美食的生活。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-F1BE7446789A
ALL ON 4與ALL ON 6植牙技術，起源於葡萄牙醫師Dr. Paulo Malo，於1993年發明特殊的植牙技術「All ON 4」，將原本整排需要6~10顆植牙的狀況，只利用4顆植體即可完成全口重建，在他累積相當成功臨床經驗與實證醫學之後，才再延伸出ALL ON 6，直至現今，已成為現今普遍被運用且熱門的植牙技術。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-2D06FDD45CB0
費用較低 ALL ON 4與ALL ON 6植牙數量已從過往大幅減至4到6顆植體，相較傳統植牙以單顆植牙的數量計算，數量減少許少，價格相對更為實惠。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-72588A81F250
不需補骨手術 相較傳統單顆植牙需每顆補骨，ALL ON 4與ALL ON 6則避開需要補骨的部位，只挑有骨質條件好的地方植牙，所以不需要補骨，大大減少痛苦且漫長的補骨階段。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: claim 聲稱 ALL ON 4/6 不需補骨，evidence 研究的是不同補骨材料在植牙周圍的骨再生效果，所有組別均進行了補骨手術。
DNT-3F9E39D3058E
療程時間縮短 相較傳統全口植牙需花費6~9個月，康德台北全口重建療程引進ALL ON 4 / ALL ON 6，不需補骨、減少漫長的療程時間，至快只需1日。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-8635740DFFC4
(實際情況因人而異，依醫師評估為主) 豐富文獻＆科學證實 發展至今的台北ALL ON 4 / ALL ON 6技術，已有10年以上長期追蹤的臨床研究報告，患者普遍效果良好，相較傳統植牙，更符合現代人需求，是牙醫界普遍公認的首選台北全口重建技術！
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-D492A45A310C
專業內湖全口重建 康德牙醫的台北全口重建療程，已累積眾多ALL ON 4 / ALL ON 6成功案例，因內湖全口重建只挑有骨頭的地方植牙，無需補骨，大幅減少病患的治療時間與不適感。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
🗂 Related analyses (5)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform