🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
2020.3.10 最新消息 植牙後的牙齒雖然不… — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
1
Partly supported
2
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (3 statements)
DNT-E9CC925BC796
2020.3.10 最新消息 植牙後的牙齒雖然不會蛀牙，但牙菌斑仍會侵襲牙齒，引發牙周病破壞牙床，導致植牙失敗。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-7753441D999F
每三至六個月回診評估→有牙結石堆積→洗牙→避免植體周圍組織發炎， 形成所謂的「人工牙根的牙周病，久而久之便會導致人工牙根的失敗而掉落。
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: evidence支持缺乏定期维护会导致种植体周围骨吸收和牙周问题
DNT-1702A9CD0436
維持良好的口腔衛生，才能保持人工牙根的健康和延長人工植牙的壽命。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: evidence 未提及維持口腔衛生與人工植牙壽命的因果關係
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform