🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
患者主訴 患者從事公關工作 — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
4
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (4 statements)
DNT-1E829B499324
案例分享 醫師案例介紹 數位瓷牙 全瓷假牙 牙齒美白 人工植牙 顯微根管 牙周治療 全口重建 顳顎障礙 齒顎矯正 患者微笑分享 媒體焦點 影片分享 改造牙齒門面，找對醫師好重要！
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 整個 claim 未被支持，包括所有列舉療程與『找對醫師好重要』之宣稱。
DNT-F98CB9AC9502
患者主訴 患者從事公關工作，右上側門牙因為根管治療後，開始變色，另外對於自己門牙不對稱的型態也不甚滿意，經由朋友介紹，約診諮詢。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 患者從事公關工作、右上側門牙根管治療後變色、門牙不對稱、朋友介紹、約診諮詢等全句主訴均未被證據提及
DNT-D71030D664BE
患者考量自身臉型較小下巴較短，希望自己牙齒看起來是可愛一點的，所以我們選用3D齒雕全瓷冠，打造出患者想要既自然又透亮的可愛門牙。
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 患者臉型與下巴、可愛美觀需求、3D齒雕全瓷冠選擇、自然透亮門牙等臨床美學宣稱均未被 evidence 提及或支持。
DNT-8ED3DA7F8D1F
患者的話 因為工作關係需要不斷開口說話，加上工作忙碌，原本側門牙做完根管治療後，就應該做假牙保護起來，結果拖延到牙齒變色不美觀才來就診，幸好在這段期間我沒有去咬到太硬的食物...(真不敢想像咬斷牙齒的狀況)，真的很感恩醫師，非常有耐心的聽我對門牙的想法，改造後就是我心目中想要的型態，真得很棒，開心分享給同事後除了得到讚美，也讓同事們開始對於自己牙齒改造很心動呢！
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: claim 是患者個人敘事：因工作拖延根管治療後假牙、牙齒變色、醫師耐心溝通、改造後美觀、同事反應等；evidence 完全未描述該患者或該療程。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform