🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
case-85 — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
1
Partly supported
1
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (2 statements)
DNT-C18FDC4A5525
Before 嚴重蛀牙 牙齦流血 根管治療 牙齦膿包 After 兒童小鋼牙 兒童全瓷冠牙套 兒童美觀樹脂牙套 兒童舒眠
◐ Partly supported (scope noted below)
Supported scope: evidence支持對嚴重牙冠-牙根斷裂的青少年進行根管治療與金屬燒瓷牙冠修復，且提及牙齦處理。
DNT-D956046B5A01
Before 嚴重蛀牙 牙齒染色 根管治療 樹脂脫落 After 恢復美觀 兒童全瓷冠牙套 兒童美觀樹脂牙套 笑氣治療
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform