🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
重新進行根管治療 神奇的是下巴原本長的東西也漸漸… — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
2
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (2 statements)
DNT-09A03CD98B94
卻始終未見好轉...... 直到她踏進翡冷翠 經陳醫師檢查後 發現可能是 過去根管治療又跑進了細菌導致根尖發炎 拿掉舊有的假牙後，
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 全句：特定患者到翡冷翠、陳醫師檢查、過去根管治療跑進細菌導致根尖發炎、拿掉舊有假牙。
DNT-A045CE5C449A
重新進行根管治療 神奇的是下巴原本長的東西也漸漸消失了！
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 「重新根管治療使下巴原有增生物消失」的介入-結果因果鏈完全未被提及；根管治療的適應症與下巴病灶關聯亦無證據。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform