🔗 IDA SENTENCE ANALYSIS
牙醫呼籲提前「功能性矯正 — sentence-by-sentence verification
0
Provable
0
Partly supported
5
Pending
0
Contradicted
What this page measures: whether each outward-facing statement on this article can be supported by dental research literature. Provable and partly-supported statements carry real PubMed references; pending and contradicted ones are marked only as "examined but insufficient / counter-evidence found", with no claim of support. The analysed content itself lives on source page ↗.
🔗 Sentence-by-sentence analysis (5 statements)
DNT-5F4604C8CB81
據統計，台灣兒童齲齒遠超出世界平均 … 閱讀全文 〈兒童牙齒隱形矯正詢問度激增〉 作者: 蔡 秉昆 2020-06-18 分類: 白金菁英級隱適美 「隱形牙套」矯正不再痠軟疼痛 我們想讓你知道的是 過去傳統矯正是將矯正器黏在牙齒表面，再以鋼線固定，過程容易產生牙肉刮傷和清潔不易等問題，而 … 閱讀全文 〈「隱形牙套」矯正不再痠軟疼痛〉 作者: 蔡 秉昆 2020-06-18 2023-05-11 分類: 白金菁英級隱適美 5 錯誤迷思讓牙齒更受傷 圖片來源：freepik 正確保養的知識 才能有一口好牙 1. 飯後要立刻刷牙？
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-7F2771401327
牙醫呼籲提前「功能性矯正」 ▲圖／HEHO健康 許多人都以為兒童接受牙齒矯正最適合的時機，是在乳牙完全脫落，恆齒生長完畢的12歲之後，但是 … 閱讀全文 〈咬合不正等換牙才就醫就太慢了！
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: claim 呼籲提前功能性矯正並質疑「12 歲後才矯正」的看法，evidence 只描述透明牙套在混合齒列的應用，未直接討論矯正時機建議。
DNT-6D3026267B96
〉 作者: 蔡 秉昆 2020-06-18 2020-06-18 分類: 牙齒矯正 矯正可以不拔牙？
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
DNT-09A199178AA6
這樣做不傷口腔 資料來源：文／趙哲暘（牙醫診所院長）<本文摘自《矯正可以不拔牙》 時報出版提供> 責任編輯：李清風 … 閱讀全文 〈矯正可以不拔牙？
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 矯正可以不拔牙或不傷口腔的宣稱
DNT-8C3D41DB47FA
這樣做不傷口腔〉 作者: 蔡 秉昆 2020-06-18 2024-01-09 分類: 牙齒矯正 文章分頁 較新的文章 1 ... 4 5 6 7 較舊的文章 加入大謙社群・掌握第一手消息 二林大謙 Facebook 城中大謙 Instagram 二林大謙 LINE 城中大謙LINE 積極面對口腔問題，
○ Pending (insufficient evidence; no claim of support)
10 candidate paper(s) examined; evidence insufficient to support this statement; still needed: 決定性 gate 未通過；不得以檢索相似度或主題重疊升為可證明。
🗂 Related analyses (8)
🏛 View this clinic's IDA embassy →
server-rendered · verifiability = degree of literature support · idaeo-platform